<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NATO in denial on killing Afghan civilians</title>
	<link>http://dearkitty.blogsome.com/2008/08/12/nato-in-denial-on-killing-afghan-civilians/</link>
	<description>My diary on peace and wars, arts, sciences, politics, the fight for economic and social justice, the environment, and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://dearkitty.blogsome.com/2008/08/12/nato-in-denial-on-killing-afghan-civilians/#comment-4448</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:06:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dearkitty.blogsome.com/2008/08/12/nato-in-denial-on-killing-afghan-civilians/#comment-4448</guid>
					<description>Afghan political prisoners cry for help
Call from Policharkhi Prison

See the call:
www.antiimperialista.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=5776&amp;amp;Itemid=55

The linked call was passed on to the Anti-imperialist Camp by the underground revolutionary anti-imperialist movement in Afghanistan which is participating in the popular resistance movement against the U.S.-led Western occupation. It was smuggled out from Policharkhi which even according to CNN “is the most notorious prison in Afghanistan” (Feb 26, 2006).

The Western installed regime together with the occupation forces keep an unknown number of political prisoners belonging to the various trends of the resistance. Most of them originate from the Islamic movement but some also belong to the leftist movement. One should not forget that under the new “democratic” regime affiliation to a communist organization is threatened by capital punishment.

We are supporting the demands of the Afghan political prisoners and will keep reporting about their protests.

***

“Restore Afghan sovereignty”

Interview with Norman Paech, international spokesman of the parliamentary fraction of the German party “Die Linke” (The Left) and professor emeritus for law in Hamburg.


Q: In the West the military presence in Afghanistan is commonly justified under the rubric of the “war on terror” or even as a mission to “export democracy”. What mainstream politicians and commentators in West describe as terrorism is for most Afghans legitimate resistance against foreign occupation. What is your view?

It is obvious that all the talk we hear of democracy and human rights is void and serves as nothing more than a pretext to further strategic and economic interests in the region – i.e., the control of the raw materials needed to fuel Western economies. Afghanistan itself is crucial mainly for transit of petroleum and natural gas from the rich deposits of Central Asia. It also has strategic political importance with regard to the relationship of the two nuclear powers of the subcontinent, India and Pakistan. It is not about “nation building” and “good governance”. This is a lie. What we have in truth is an imperial protectorate.

Q: So do you consider resistance legitimate?

Resistance against foreign occupation in Iraq or Afghanistan is legitimate as long as it limits itself to military targets and refrains from deliberately attacking civilians. In this sense I would like to make it clear that we distance ourselves from the cruel methods of the Taliban.

Read the full interview:
www.antiimperialista.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=5758&amp;amp;Itemid=55</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Afghan political prisoners cry for help<br />
Call from Policharkhi Prison</p>
	<p>See the call:<br />
<a >www.antiimperialista.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=5776&amp;Itemid=55</a></p>
	<p>The linked call was passed on to the Anti-imperialist Camp by the underground revolutionary anti-imperialist movement in Afghanistan which is participating in the popular resistance movement against the U.S.-led Western occupation. It was smuggled out from Policharkhi which even according to CNN “is the most notorious prison in Afghanistan” (Feb 26, 2006).</p>
	<p>The Western installed regime together with the occupation forces keep an unknown number of political prisoners belonging to the various trends of the resistance. Most of them originate from the Islamic movement but some also belong to the leftist movement. One should not forget that under the new “democratic” regime affiliation to a communist organization is threatened by capital punishment.</p>
	<p>We are supporting the demands of the Afghan political prisoners and will keep reporting about their protests.</p>
	<p>***</p>
	<p>“Restore Afghan sovereignty”</p>
	<p>Interview with Norman Paech, international spokesman of the parliamentary fraction of the German party “Die Linke” (The Left) and professor emeritus for law in Hamburg.</p>
	<p>Q: In the West the military presence in Afghanistan is commonly justified under the rubric of the “war on terror” or even as a mission to “export democracy”. What mainstream politicians and commentators in West describe as terrorism is for most Afghans legitimate resistance against foreign occupation. What is your view?</p>
	<p>It is obvious that all the talk we hear of democracy and human rights is void and serves as nothing more than a pretext to further strategic and economic interests in the region – i.e., the control of the raw materials needed to fuel Western economies. Afghanistan itself is crucial mainly for transit of petroleum and natural gas from the rich deposits of Central Asia. It also has strategic political importance with regard to the relationship of the two nuclear powers of the subcontinent, India and Pakistan. It is not about “nation building” and “good governance”. This is a lie. What we have in truth is an imperial protectorate.</p>
	<p>Q: So do you consider resistance legitimate?</p>
	<p>Resistance against foreign occupation in Iraq or Afghanistan is legitimate as long as it limits itself to military targets and refrains from deliberately attacking civilians. In this sense I would like to make it clear that we distance ourselves from the cruel methods of the Taliban.</p>
	<p>Read the full interview:<br />
<a >www.antiimperialista.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=5758&amp;Itemid=55</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
